Had Vivo charged 2300 or 2400, it would have been a very good choice competing instead with the Mi 9 SE. With that being said, I totally agree that having no-notch and a better battery life is very attractive. A much better selfie camera that pops up, a notch-less display, and most likely better battery life (675 likely less battery intensive, and it has a 400MaH battery).īoth devices have their compromises, but I think that many informed consumers would pick the Mi 9. On the other hand, this new Vivo device does have some advantages. This means, Qualcomm snapdragon 675 seems powerful over Helio P90, because Snapdragon 675 has used latest Cortex A-76 cores in their chipset, while P90 has.
This phone (specification wise) should have competed in price with the SE variant of Mi 9 (1999RMB).įor just 300RMB more the Mi 9 has a telephoto lens, SD855, an arguably sleeker look, USB-C (not that I really care), fast wireless charging, and an arguably better OS.
However, Vivo has priced this in Mi 9 territory (2999RMB) and shot themselves in the foot. Why is MediaTek Helio P70 better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 15.49 faster CPU speed 4 x 2.1GHz & 4 x 2GHzvs2 x 2GHz & 6 x 1.7GHz 55MHz faster GPU clock. In terms of Graphics, MediaTek Helio P70 has Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and Bifrost architecture and latter Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 comes up with Adreno 612 GPU and Adreno 600 architecture. If this device were a few hundred RMB cheaper, it could be a competitive device. MediaTek Helio P70 comes up with 8 cores, 2100 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency.
0 kommentar(er)
